Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
- Subject: Re: Read-Timeout with Blocking Socket
- From: Josh Graessley <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:06:35 -0800
select is so yesterday. Check out kqueue.
-josh
On Feb 19, 2007, at 5:23 AM, Colin Hirsch wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 04:51:38PM -0600, Marc Epard wrote:
Call select with a timeout, then, depending on what select returns,
call read.
Select() is infinitely better than alarm or setitimer, but I would
recommund poll() rather than select(), if possible -- on most
systems it's faster, and I believe that it's also easier to use.
Regards, Colin
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40apple.com
This email sent to email@hidden
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden