Lists

Open Menu Close Menu

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()

Subject: Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()
From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:30:20 -0700

On Apr 30, 2008, at 4:13 AM, Kristopher Matthews wrote:

If you see my followup message, I wrote the sample code for this email incorrectly. My apologies. :)
It should be:
double mach_elapsed_time(uint64_t start, uint64_t endTime)
{

You are doing a couple of really simple things wrong, but the worst is being wrong about operator precedence order in C.

-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()
From: Kristopher Matthews <email@hidden>


References:  
  >mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep() (From: Kristopher Matthews <email@hidden>)
  >Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep() (From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>)
  >Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep() (From: Kristopher Matthews <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Virtual COM driver issue - dlil_ouput output error retval =37

Next by Date:
Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()

Previous by thread:
Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()

Next by thread:
Re: mach_absolute_time() vs. sleep()

Index(es):

Date
Thread