Re: rand() and srand() broken?
Re: rand() and srand() broken?
- Subject: Re: rand() and srand() broken?
- From: Amanda Walker <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:18:46 -0500
On Nov 25, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Derek Gaston wrote:
Heh - I knew this would come up. The issue is that we need to be
able to reliably _regenerate_ different random numbers over and
over.... but on a grand scale.
Then you should use your own PRNG with the statistical properties you
need. srand() and rand() come with very few guarantees.
--Amanda
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden