Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- Subject: Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:11:56 -0700
On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Steve Checkoway wrote:
On Sep 4, 2009, at 10:00 AM, William Siegrist wrote:
The Darwin Team is aware of the request for libunwind. I'll put
down another vote for it, so no need to file more radars or emails.
Comments like this confuse me since other @apple.com people have
said that radars are the only way Apple knows what people are
wanting and duplicate radars show more interest.
[ ... could have been quoting me, too ... ]
The radar in this case isn't an engineering radar, it's a legal one,
and they d not like taking interrupts. A bunch of dups on a legal
radar are not going to really bear on what is, in the end, a business
rather than a technical decision.
-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden