Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)

Subject: Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
From: Joar Wingfors <email@hidden>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:25:41 -0700


On 4 sep 2009, at 19.11, Terry Lambert wrote:

The radar in this case isn't an engineering radar, it's a legal one, and they d not like taking interrupts. A bunch of dups on a legal radar are not going to really bear on what is, in the end, a business rather than a technical decision.

And you're suggesting that business decisions aren't influenced by the amount of public interest? :-D

j o a r


_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Building 10.6' ld64 (From: Jonas Maebe <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Building 10.6' ld64 (From: Peter O'Gorman <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Building 10.6' ld64 (From: William Siegrist <email@hidden>)
  >Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64) (From: Steve Checkoway <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64) (From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: method_exchangeImplementations problem

Next by Date:
Re: method_exchangeImplementations problem

Previous by thread:
Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)

Next by thread:
Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)

Index(es):

Date
Thread