Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- Subject: Re: Duplicate radars: good or bad? (Was: Re: Building 10.6' ld64)
- From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 00:40:31 -0700
On Sep 5, 2009, at 12:25 AM, Joar Wingfors wrote:
On 4 sep 2009, at 19.11, Terry Lambert wrote:
The radar in this case isn't an engineering radar, it's a legal
one, and they d not like taking interrupts. A bunch of dups on a
legal radar are not going to really bear on what is, in the end, a
business rather than a technical decision.
And you're suggesting that business decisions aren't influenced by
the amount of public interest? :-D
The corollary to "The squeaky wheel gets the grease" is:
“If trees could scream, would we be so cavalier about cutting them
down? We might, if they screamed all the time, for no good reason.”
- Jack Handy
-- Terry _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden