Re: xnu-792.18.15 source
Re: xnu-792.18.15 source
- Subject: Re: xnu-792.18.15 source
- From: "Mark F. Murphy" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:27:10 -0700
At 3:50 PM +0100 3/23/07, Andreas Fink wrote:
That's what someone would expect if its OPEN source. Otherwise the
kernel should be declared CLOSED source as its source is not
revealed (or at least the difference between the released binary and
the released source).
Can we stop the lecture from self declared experts on what Open Source means?
This isn't an advocacy list.... it's a technical list.
mark
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark F. Murphy, Director Software Development <mailto:email@hidden>
Tyrell Software Corp <http://www.tyrell.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden