Re: Leopard Sources?
Re: Leopard Sources?
- Subject: Re: Leopard Sources?
- From: Andrew Gallatin <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 16:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
> having it, and to kick out their shiny XServes and put some lousy =20
> Sun's into their racks just because Apple can't adopt SCTP, and gives =20=
I agree with everything you say. However, please don't denegrate Sun.
At least via OpenSolaris, the Sun development process is transparent.
Granted, it is somewhat byzantine by tranditional Open Source
standards, but at least 3rd party developers have access to the
development source and the revision control system. Contrast this to
the Apple "Top Secret, everthing under NDA, pay us $500 to try the
binary" model. Not to mention that Solaris blows the doors off of
Darwin on the same hardware...
Drew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden