Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
- Subject: Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
- From: "Igor Mikushkin" <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 12:05:43 +0500
2008/5/22 Terry Lambert <email@hidden>:
>
> Maybe we can step back a second...
>
> What are you trying to accomplish here that you think getting an upcall
> would accomplish for you?
>
> -- Terry
>
I'm trying to understand how to work with kernel sockets in a proper way.
I decided to follow the rule: first upcall is always response to
sock_connect, the others are receive upcalls (even if they are not).
The truth of this rule is my main question related to upcall.
Thanks.
Igor
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden