Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
- Subject: Re: Asynchronous sock_sendmbuf
- From: Terry Lambert <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 00:43:15 -0700
On May 22, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Igor Mikushkin wrote:
2008/5/22 Terry Lambert <email@hidden>:
Maybe we can step back a second...
What are you trying to accomplish here that you think getting an
upcall
would accomplish for you?
I'm trying to understand how to work with kernel sockets in a proper
way.
I decided to follow the rule: first upcall is always response to
sock_connect, the others are receive upcalls (even if they are not).
The truth of this rule is my main question related to upcall.
You realize that if it's not documented, it's not supported, and even
if you find out that something currently works, if you depend on it,
there's no guarantee that your application will still work after the
next software update if you use what you discover, right?
-- Terry
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden