Re: Hard-limits for kern.maxproc
Re: Hard-limits for kern.maxproc
- Subject: Re: Hard-limits for kern.maxproc
- From: Nathan <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 00:51:32 -0700
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Michael Smith <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Nathan wrote:
>
> I will continue to keep an eye out for shifts in the landscape for OS
> X server. I hope to be proven wrong in the future, and find that OS X
> Server delivers on its promises.
>
> Nathan,
> Terry is an engineer, not a marketing chap, and this sort of poorly veiled
> threat is just going to give him something to share with his co-workers at
> the next beer bash.
What veiled threat? I'm usually accused of being overly blunt, not
beating around the bush. I've already stated that I canceled the
remaining projects we had planned for the Xserve. The point of that
last paragraph was that I WANT OS X Server to get better so that I can
use it for more things.
> The #1 thing the average user/developer/admin can do to motivate Apple to
> make changes that will improve their products in your context is to write a
> bug. In fact, I encourage you to write many bugs, because the more and the
> better bugs you write, the more significance tends to get attached to them.
> = Mike
I agree. I have reported several bugs to Apple, and will continue to
do so. It was sort of neat back when Leopard came out that two of my
bugs were suddenly marked as having been resolved. I wish that would
happen between major OS releases as well... :-)
~ Nathan
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden