Re: Why support volfs ?
Re: Why support volfs ?
- Subject: Re: Why support volfs ?
- From: shailesh jain <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:10:18 -0700
Thanks. I understand that. However, what I am really interested or curious to know
is the portion that I wrote after that.
i.e could support vs no support make a huge performance difference ?
"When I run firefox over NFS, it runs painfully slow (it makes tons of
geteuid() system calls) and when I run it over AFP it works
great (lot less number of geteuid() system calls). And I know that firefox is accessing volfs. So throwing question in the air, could it be support for volfs (AFP) vs no support for volfs (NFS). "
/Shail
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Michael Smith
<email@hidden> wrote:
On Jun 16, 2009, at 2:54 PM, shailesh jain wrote:
I was reading Technote (http://devworld.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1113.html). I wanted to know what is the advantage of supporting volfs (looks like carbon file manager works around when you do not support volfs).
The advantages of lookup by persistent identifier should be obvious. This is a strong metaphor that enables applications on MacOS to retain the ability to locate filesystem objects despite their being moved or renamed by other applications.
Users tend to associate files with their content, not their name or place in the filesystem hierarchy; this allows applications to maintain a similar association.
= Mike
--
True terror is to wake up one morning and discover that your high school class is running the country. -- Kurt Vonnegut
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Darwin-kernel mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden