• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33


  • Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
  • From: Michael Pike <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:16:36 -0700

I try to give him the benefit of the doubt... He is bald as a baby's butt -
and it's getting cold in Redmond, so he may be suffering from brain freeze.

There is no accountability.  If it's so much safer.... Ugh nevermind.  If I
get worked up this time of night I won't be able to sleep :)

Isn't the Gartner group the group that claims to be "neutral" for IT
information?  Kind of hard to be neutral if you have someone like Balmer as
a keynote speaker.


Mike



On 11/13/04 6:58 PM, "Mark Moorcroft" <email@hidden> wrote:

>
> Funny, Balmer was just recently a keynote speaker at the Gartner conference.
> He claimed that Windoze was a safer bet because holes are patched in a much
> more timely manner because there is accountability. That man will say just
> about anything and I actually think HE believes that crap he spews. I think
> he actually had the guts to claim that holes get patched in days not weeks
> or months.
>
>> From: "Pike, Michael" <email@hidden>
>> Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] ammo: mi2g OS X is world's safest and most
>> secure
>>
>> I totally disagree - I often hear this response from Microsoft advocates any
>> time a security hole arises in Windows (whoa, there is another one!  And
>> another! :)
>>
>> *nix kernels (OS X, FreeBSD, etc) are open source, and reviewed by millions
>> of developers.  Microsoft's kernel is not.
>>
>> If you have a corn field that is 600 acres, and you have to find every
>> ladybug in that field with 3 spots (bugs), and you have 1 million people
>> looking at it, you will find a significantly larger number of bugs than
>> someone who has a team of 100 people looking for them.
>>
>> I believe the low number of "hacks" related to *nix OS's is due to the fact
>> that problems are found and fixed BEFORE they become a problem, as opposed
>> to the Microsoft platform which are patched AFTER someone gets hit.
>>
>> Even if the number of OS X and Microsoft based installations were equal (I
>> believe it's possible, I'm working for that), you would still see a
>> significantly smaller number of "hacks" for the OS X platform for the mere
>> fact that problems are discovered and fixed before they were ever realized
>> to be a problem.
>>
>> Mike
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
      • From: Brian Raymond <email@hidden>
References: 
 >[Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33 (From: Mark Moorcroft <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
  • Next by Date: Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
  • Previous by thread: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
  • Next by thread: Re: [Fed-Talk] Re: Fed-talk Digest, Vol 1, Issue 33
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread