Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] "User" v. "Consumer" v. "Enterprise"
- From: "Timothy J. Miller" <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 13:30:46 -0600
In short, because there is no separation of services from presentation,
and no separation of services from one another in the Exchange/Outlook
environment. In other words you can't replace components of Exchange
and/or Outlook and expect it all to work. E.g., I can't replace the
mailbox server with Courier-IMAP and still have Outlook calendar function.
They're trending in that direction, but only halfheartedly. They know
that designing Exchange and Outlook as I describe would eliminate the
vendor lock-in that keeps the revenue flowing.
-- Tim
Fletcher, Boyd C. CIV US USJFCOM JFL J9935 wrote:
why?
On 12/30/08 2:15 PM, "Timothy J. Miller" <email@hidden> wrote:
Joel Esler wrote:
Also, don't forget that Snow Leopard has native Exchange support for
all three of these.
Except that Exchange is not a good example of the type of presentation
layer integration I'm talking about. :)
-- Tim
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden