Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
- From: "Blackmon Jerry (Contractor)" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:02:42 -0400
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Comparing Macs to PCs by Microsoft Site
I didn't say it was perfect, I said it was the beginning of a trend that's clear today. That "response" site didn't come out of nowhere.
And completely agree. Public Beta - "Jagwire" were for "us." Panther was for regular people.
--
Jerry L. Blackmon II <email@hidden>
Senior Systems Administrator
Open Technology Group (Contractor)
OITO, Bureau of Engraving and Printing
"The more I learn about computers, the more I like my pencil." -- Susan Katz
On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:54 AM, James Alcasid wrote:
> Mac OS X 10.0 was actually pretty bad, hence 10.1 a few months later. We
> used Classic a lot back then and Mac OS 9.0.2 was faster on the same
> hardware. Mac OS X in my book was not useable until 10.3.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden