Re: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
Re: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
- From: "Miller, Timothy J." <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 13:03:40 +0000
- Thread-topic: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
Actually, issues with the platform go far deeper than simply FIPS.
Integration is not a simple task.
-- T
On 4/16/12 5:24 PM, "Czajka, Edward J CIV NAVAIR, NAWCWD"
<email@hidden> wrote:
>The problem is FIPS 140-2. For a mobile device like an iPad, anything
>that is stored within the app needs to be FIPS 140-2. Now you can use
>Good For Enterprise, which provides a sandbox that is FIPS 140-2
>compliant. They also provide code for the developers, so they can
>leverage their app with the storage requirement. By the way, Good for
>Enterprise is Exchange dependant.
>
>The main problem, not many apps support it, or are verifiable. App
>control needs to be enforced, so only the authorized apps are utilized.
>From what I understand, if you have a developers account, you can run
>your own iTunes server for management of the devices. I have not gotten
>that far.
>
>Apple is trying to get FIPS modules verified and approved, but it is
>still pending review, so that could be a while. If that does happen, I
>would suspect that it would cover the entire device, which would allow
>the military folk to use any app, without the developer building in the
>capability. Lets Hope!!!!
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC [mailto:email@hidden]
>Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 8:15
>To: Fasano, John W COL USAR 228 CSH, 807th MDSC
>Cc: Fed Talk
>Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
>
>Thanks. Any input you can give on how we can best leverage an Ipad would
>be appreciated, especially in keeping with regs and policies. We're
>basically being told we can't keep anything other than public information
>on them, nothing official, which doesn't sound right. While our training
>material is for public release I can't see how any other organization
>(without dealing with training) could use the things without keeping
>something official on them. It sounds like overkill.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Fasano, John W COL USAR 228 CSH, 807th MDSC"
><email@hidden>
>Date: Friday, April 13, 2012 15:17
>Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] Dot Mil folks on this list?
>To: "Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC" <email@hidden>
>Cc: Fed Talk <email@hidden>
>
>
>> I'm .mil
>>
>> John W. Fasano
>> COL, MS
>> Chief of Ops and Admin
>> 228th Combat Support Hospital
>> Blackberry: 210-439-9042
>> E-Mail: email@hidden
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:34 PM, "Villano, Paul Mr CIV USA TRADOC" < wrote:
>>
>> > My question about Ipad rules (which lock them down so ridiculously
>>for .mil that they are mostly useless) got me wondering how many .mil
>>folks are on the list? Since this is public if you don't want to reply
>>on list please do reply off list so I know who to go to for .mil only
>>questions offline.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> > Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
>> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> >
>>l
>> >
>> > This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden