Re: [Fed-Talk] [EXTERNAL] ATO for Notarization?
Re: [Fed-Talk] [EXTERNAL] ATO for Notarization?
- Subject: Re: [Fed-Talk] [EXTERNAL] ATO for Notarization?
- From: "Walls, Bryan K. \(MSFC-HP27\) via Fed-talk" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:04:20 +0000
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ndjsvnpf103.ndc.nasa.gov AB383401FF3E
- Thread-topic: [EXTERNAL] [Fed-Talk] ATO for Notarization?
I’m not involved in the details of the procurement discussions, but isn’t Apple
Notarization just a weak version of the Apple Developer agreement and having an
app approved? Seems it would be more a case of having an approved TOS on the
account that an ATO on a system.
From: Fed-talk <fed-talk-bounces+bryan.walls=email@hidden> on
behalf of "Marcus, Allan B via Fed-talk" <email@hidden>
Reply-To: "Marcus, Allan B" <email@hidden>
Date: Friday, June 14, 2019 at 2:51 PM
To: "List: Fed Talk" <email@hidden>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Fed-Talk] ATO for Notarization?
Is anyone aware of any federal agencies that has granted ATO to use the Apple
Notarization service for app security? Since it's a cloud service, I assume ATO
is required. From what I understand, 10.15 will require notarization, even for
in house apps.
Any further info is appreciated.
--
Thanks,
Allan Marcus
Los Alamos National Laboratory
505-667-5666
email@hidden<mailto:email@hidden>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Fed-talk mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden