• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?


  • Subject: Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?
  • From: Marek Kozubal <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 23:34:31 -0500 (EST)


No, wait! I just discovered that if I manually edit the "Info.plist" file in the "xxx.pkg" bundle, and remove the "IFRequirementDicts" key/value pair, my Check tools are run. This seems wrong. Even if the Requirements are used instead of the InstallationCheck tool, I would still expect the "VolumeCheck" tool to be executed, because there are no volume-specific Requirements.

From
http://tuvix.apple.com/documentation/DeveloperTools/Conceptual/SoftwareDistribution/Concepts/sd_spec_install_req.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001949-1023442-BGBGBCDG

Available prior to Mac OS X v10.3. Scripts will work in v10.3, but are ignored if the package also includes requirements information in its property list.

Basically, in 10.3 and later, if you have any sort of requirements plist info, the InstallationCheck and VolumeCheck scripts/executables no longer are run. They are mearly there for pre-10.3 support at this point, or instead of the requirements system.


-Marek
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts? (From: Scott Fraser <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?
  • Next by Date: Installation script arguments
  • Previous by thread: Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?
  • Next by thread: Re: Can I use "Check" programs, instead of scripts?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread