Re: Installer on Mac
Re: Installer on Mac
- Subject: Re: Installer on Mac
- From: "Andy O'Meara" <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 23:20:39 -0400
- Thread-topic: Installer on Mac
Title: Re: Installer on Mac
While we’re talking about PackageMaker , any word on if we’ll be seeing any major new additions/changes this August? Or, at the least, fixes to PackageMaker 2.1? Anyone else here still get concerned/annoyed/frustrated about how the ‘Authentication:’ popup menu always flips back to “Root” when you set it to “Administrator” when you flip panes or save your document? It’d be nice to ship software with a vers of PackageMaker that doesn’t have this issue...
Andy
P.S. Yes, I’ve filed this as a bug, but as always, it’s marked as a duplicate.
On 5/12/06 10:03 AM, "Christopher Ryan" <email@hidden> wrote:
The rule of thumb should be, If you don't need an installer, don't use one. If you do, by all means, use the Apple Installer.
Everyone wants a drag and drop experience and for Applications which are a single bundle or folder, this is what the users should get (by distributing as a disk image).
For times where you need to install frameworks or other files in the system, it is much better to use an installer then to expect the customers to drag the components to the right places.
Additionally, an installer can display important information (read me, license, etc), that your customers may need to read before launching your app (assuming you can't display these on the first launch).
Almost all of Apple's applications use Installers (iLife, Pro Apps, Mac OS X, iWork) and I think it is something our customers come to expect.
Chris
I wish to make an installer for Mac, but this is an answer from someone on the Director Mailing List :
> Does anybody have experience with making Mac Installers?
>
>
>
> I see there's an application named "installer" included in Mac Os X.
> Is it to be trusted? Or are there other alternatives which are better?
yes, make a bundle put it on a nicely layouted diskimage, which opens automatically, and leave it to the user to drag the application, where the user considers appropriately.
that's the way it is supposed to work on OSX.
installers are only necessary, if you want to actually install system services, but an application should simply be a drag and drop install, wherever I like it to live on my HD. I think the average mac user is not only used to that, but also capable of drag installing an app and might even be offended, if you treat him as being too stupid to drag install an application.
I'd even go one step further: a simple application, which needs an installer is something, which I usually don't even install, as I think, that it is looking for trouble to run applications, which were made by developers, which don't even know the basics of my OS.
It seems Mac-users don’t like the idea of an installer. Is this true?
Thx, Lieven Cardoen
lieven cardoen
indiegroup
interactive digital experience
engelse wandeling 2 k18
b8500 kortrijk
T +32 (0)56/361 197
// communicatie bij voorkeur op email@hidden <mailto:email@hidden>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden