Re: PackageMaker 3.0 "Allow Relocation", file permissions bugs
Re: PackageMaker 3.0 "Allow Relocation", file permissions bugs
- Subject: Re: PackageMaker 3.0 "Allow Relocation", file permissions bugs
- From: Kevin Hoyt <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:11:03 -0800
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:00:17 -0800
From: Nathan Duran <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: PackageMaker 3.0 "Allow
Relocation", file permissions
bugs
To: Justin Greenfield <email@hidden>
Cc: email@hidden
Message-ID: <email@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed; delsp=yes
On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Justin
Greenfield wrote:
> All I know for sure is that the
PackageMaker GUI has a lot of bugs.
That's putting it mildly, I'd say ;)
I'll keep the project relative glitch
in mind the next time it crops
up. I don't even want to open my projects
to check what they're set to
now since they seem to be working and
I don't want to jinx it.
Everybody always lambasts Adobe for
refusing to utilize standard
installation packages, but when you
can easily end up wasting hours on
a simple installer that only deposits
two or three files, I don't see
how they have any choice in the matter.
Just wanted to add my 2 cents to this...
I create two disk images, one to store
the package contents before packaging, one to hold the real installation.
This allows me to have fully qualified
paths that are consistant accross systems and gets around the relative
path issues...
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden