• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Permissions weirdness
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Permissions weirdness


  • Subject: Permissions weirdness
  • From: Kirk Gleason <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 17:51:58 -0400

Hello all,
I am relatively new the Package Maker stuff, and the package that I am currently working on is by far the most involved one that I have ever done. Essentially, I am trying to develop a package for an application and relevant ODBC settings. The ODBC part is working like a charm, but for some reason, the permissions on the Application itself are getting out of whack when I install it. I have the permissions set the way that I want them in my package root, and they look like this:


775 root AD\domain users package_root/Applications/Application.app

(Obviously that is not exactly it, but you get the idea).

When I install the package on a test machine, the app in question ends up with permissions of 775 root 47275.

What I cannot figure out is where the 47275 gid is coming from....

lsbom Archive.bom inside the pkg shows me a line that looks like this:

./Applications/Application.app	100775	0/115587243	82	40377167

Now I am not entirely sure what all of those numbers are, but I have figured out (or I think I have) that the first number (100775) is the permissions for the file, and the second (0/115587243) is the UID/ GID. The GID is correct. It is so high because it is actually an active directory group.

So, does anyone have any idea why the gid on the installed application is showing up as something different? Is there a maximum gid that the Package Maker can deal with?

I am installing as an admin on the machine, and it is a domain account. If I run `chgrp -R 'AD\domain users' Application.app` the permissions adjust as they should, so the test machine does recognize the 'domain users' friendly name, and the gid is exactly the same for domain users on my development box and my test box.



--
Kirk Gleason
Systems Engineer
Finelight Strategic Marketing Communications
812.339.6700
--
Knowledge-Definition Warning:
Because knowledge is defined, for the purpose of this e-mail,
as "justified true belief"; the writer cannot prove that they
"know" any of the information provided within this e-mail to
be true, correct, complete, or consistent because they cannot
demonstrate their internal belief states through the principle
of Philosophic Privacy.


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Permissions weirdness
      • From: Julian Devlin <email@hidden>
    • Re: Permissions weirdness
      • From: Peter Bierman <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Installer plugins on 10.3
  • Next by Date: Re: Permissions weirdness
  • Previous by thread: Re: Installer plugins on 10.3
  • Next by thread: Re: Permissions weirdness
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread