• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Package Maker ownership issues
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Package Maker ownership issues


  • Subject: Re: Package Maker ownership issues
  • From: Iceberg-Dev <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:25:24 +0200


On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:24 PM, Jakub Bednar wrote:


On Oct 5, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Iceberg-Dev wrote:


On Oct 5, 2009, at 11:04 AM, Jakub Bednar wrote:


On Oct 2, 2009, at 5:14 PM, Greg Neagle wrote:

user/group info for filesystem items is _always_ stored as numeric
values.
When you create your user, specify the UID at that time as well.


[...]


Well ok,

You are probably right in 99% of the cases. But I'm installing a transparent proxy that needs a unique UID in the system to take advantage of UID matching in firewall rules. Never mind, there are workarounds. I was just wondering why it is not supported.

Thanks a lot,

Jakub

P.S. There is a bunch of Linux/FreeBSD software that is creating new user accounts in the system for their purposes. It is just a normal way of doing things on Linux/FreeBSD. There is also no problem to create an invisible user without home directory and password with the dscl utility, so why not support it in Installers?

It is supported since you can do it in a package with a script.

It's just that it would not be a good idea for the Installer to create a new user account just because there is a file in the package payload whose owner does not exist on the target system.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Package Maker ownership issues
      • From: Jakub Bednar <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Package Maker ownership issues (From: Jakub Bednar <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Package Maker ownership issues (From: Greg Neagle <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Package Maker ownership issues (From: Jakub Bednar <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Package Maker ownership issues (From: Iceberg-Dev <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Package Maker ownership issues (From: Jakub Bednar <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: PackageMaker allow for optional install?
  • Next by Date: Re: PackageMaker allow for optional install?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Package Maker ownership issues
  • Next by thread: Re: Package Maker ownership issues
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread