Re: Installer delivery format
Re: Installer delivery format
- Subject: Re: Installer delivery format
- From: helpcrypto helpcrypto <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:17:54 +0200
iirc (correct me if im wrong), mpkg are seen as a folder on
windows/unix systems, so ill recommend .dmg to prevent things like
"thumbs.db" creation inside your installer :P
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Swaroop Bhola <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are in the process of creating a flat installer. We had a bundle based
> installer earlier so while shipping it we used to make a dmg to ensure that
> it doesn’t get corrupt while downloading. Do we need to deliver the flat
> package as a dmg or can we directly ship/upload flat mpkg installer? What
> are the pros and cons for both?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Swaroop
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden