RE: Installer delivery format
RE: Installer delivery format
- Subject: RE: Installer delivery format
- From: Swaroop Bhola <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:54:39 +0530
- Thread-topic: Installer delivery format
Flat mpkg is treated as a file only and not a folder on Windows/unix systems.
~S
-----Original Message-----
From: helpcrypto helpcrypto [mailto:email@hidden]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 3:48 PM
To: Swaroop Bhola
Cc: email@hidden
Subject: Re: Installer delivery format
iirc (correct me if im wrong), mpkg are seen as a folder on windows/unix systems, so ill recommend .dmg to prevent things like "thumbs.db" creation inside your installer :P
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Swaroop Bhola <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We are in the process of creating a flat installer. We had a bundle
> based installer earlier so while shipping it we used to make a dmg to
> ensure that it doesn’t get corrupt while downloading. Do we need to
> deliver the flat package as a dmg or can we directly ship/upload flat
> mpkg installer? What are the pros and cons for both?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Swaroop
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> il.com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Installer-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden