• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)


  • Subject: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • From: Duane Murphy <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:00:33 -0800

--- At Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:36:52 +0000, Quinn wrote:

> If you want absolute best performance on
>hundreds of connections simultaneously, lots of non-blocking socket
>with select (bletch) is fastest.

I am curious about this comment (bletch). I am new to unix network
programming and this seemed to be a fairly powerful non-blocking way of
dealing with sockets.

What am I missing?

...Duane


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
      • From: email@hidden
    • Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
      • From: Quinn <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?) (From: Quinn <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Threads vs Select (was Re: Re(2): [Repost] OTCountFreeBytes? (like OTCountDataBytes but for send))
  • Next by Date: Re: Threads vs Select (was Re: Re(2): [Repost] OTCountFreeBytes? (like OTCountDataBytes but for send))
  • Previous by thread: Re: Recommended API for two-way transfers
  • Next by thread: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread