• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)


  • Subject: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • From: email@hidden
  • Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:52:49 -0500

On Monday, February 4, 2002, at 02:00 PM, Duane Murphy wrote:

--- At Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:36:52 +0000, Quinn wrote:

If you want absolute best performance on
hundreds of connections simultaneously, lots of non-blocking socket
with select (bletch) is fastest.

I am curious about this comment (bletch). I am new to unix network
programming and this seemed to be a fairly powerful non-blocking way of
dealing with sockets.

What am I missing?

I dunno. I've been using it for decades and have no complaints. If you are new
to network programming on UNIX, I would strongly recommend "Unix Network Programming",
Second Edition by Stevens (both volumes) ISBN #013490012x, and I'd buy it here:
http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=4-013490012x-0
because it costs $234 at amazon.com (must be a website bug).


email@hidden


References: 
 >Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?) (From: Duane Murphy <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Network Programming Models (was OTCountFreeBytes?)
  • Next by thread: Threads vs Select (was Re: Re(2): [Repost] OTCountFreeBytes? (like OTCountDataBytes but for send))
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread