• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings


  • Subject: Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings
  • From: Quinn <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 10:35:34 +0100

At 9:52 +1000 27/9/05, Heath Raftery wrote:
My vote goes to the NSString.

I'd probably vote for this as well. It's not the best approach in the specific case you mention (-acceptOnAddress:port:), but it's the best solution in general.


At 1:45 -0700 25/9/05, Dustin Voss wrote:
To my knowledge, there are four high-level APIs the developer might have used to get a particular address: System Configuration, Open Transport, CFHost, and NSHost.

Why not provide your own API to get the list of local addresses? That way you can return the address in a format that's compatible with your -acceptOnAddress:port: input.


At 1:45 -0700 25/9/05, Dustin Voss wrote:
Whichever I choose, I want to support both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. I don't care about DNS names. But I will need to be able to verify that the developer did not pass a DNS name or an address of another computer to the method. And I need to end up with a sockaddr struct.

You can just let bind do this for you. If you try to bind to an address that's not local, you'll get an error (AFAICT EADDRNOTAVAIL).


At 9:52 +1000 27/9/05, Heath Raftery wrote:
I haven't had to deal with the extra difficulties you'll face, and you've probably already got this far, but here's what I use to go from NSString to sockaddr:

struct sockaddr_in socketAddress;
socketAddress.sin_family = AF_INET;
socketAddress.sin_port = htons(fRemoteHostPort);
inet_aton([fRemoteHostIPAddress cString], &(socketAddress.sin_addr));
memset(&(socketAddress.sin_zero), '\0', 8); // zero the rest of the struct

If you want to work at the BSD level, I think that getaddrinfo <x-man-page://3/getaddrinfo> is the best choice. It supports both v4 and v6. By passing AI_NUMERICHOST, you can get it to just support the textual representation of numerical IP addresses, and never hit the wire.


S+E
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!"                    <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Technical Support * Networking, Communications, Hardware
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings
      • From: Dustin Voss <email@hidden>
References: 
 >sockaddr structs vs. address strings (From: Dustin Voss <email@hidden>)
 >Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings (From: Heath Raftery <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: netstat & port scanning
  • Next by Date: Re: choosing a network port
  • Previous by thread: Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings
  • Next by thread: Re: sockaddr structs vs. address strings
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread