• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Custom protocol implementation?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Custom protocol implementation?


  • Subject: Re: Custom protocol implementation?
  • From: Quinn <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:26:01 +0000

At 9:06 +0100 27/11/07, Dennis Thrysøe wrote:
I'm looking for pointers on where to start for implementing a custom protocol that can be mounted as a volume - just like for instance ftp and smb. I'm not sure if it would be a block-device level or filesystem level(?).

The examples you quote are both VFS plug-ins [1]. Your starting point for such development should be DTS Q&A 1242 "Developing for VFS".


<http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1242.html>

You should be aware of the limitations described in Q&A 1387 "Integrating With The Connect to Server Dialog".

<http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2004/qa1387.html>

You might also want to look at MacFUSE. It's a great way to get cool results quickly.

<http://code.google.com/p/macfuse/>

Finally, the best mailing list for file system development questions is filesystem-dev.

<http://lists.apple.com/filesystem-dev>

Share and Enjoy
--
Quinn "The Eskimo!"                    <http://www.apple.com/developer/>
Apple Developer Relations, Developer Technical Support, Core OS/Hardware

[1] Well, actually, FTP is a loopback NFS mount, but it /should/ be a VFS plug-in IMHO.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Custom protocol implementation? (From: Dennis Thrysøe <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Upgrading a kext
  • Next by Date: Re: Upgrading a kext
  • Previous by thread: Re: Custom protocol implementation?
  • Next by thread: discovering whether the time on a host is correct (and being updated)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread