Re: Surely someone knows this ?!
Re: Surely someone knows this ?!
- Subject: Re: Surely someone knows this ?!
- From: Jens Alfke <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:47:34 -0700
On Mar 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Hamish Allan wrote:
> I'd have thought it was an implementation detail and therefore subject
> to change. It's also premature optimisation until you've done some
> profiling!
+1. This is, AFAIK, a proprietary protocol (on top of Bluetooth) so there’s not a lot of info about what goes over the wire.
Anyway, latency is generally a bigger issue than bandwidth. Regardless of how much or little data can fit in a packet, it’s better to send data in larger chunks to minimize the overhead of having to wait for acknowledgement of each message.
But as Hamish said: premature optimization. Just implement it first by doing “the simplest thing that could possibly work”, then try it out and see if it’s adequate. If not, optimize and iterate.
—Jens _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Macnetworkprog mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden