• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.


  • Subject: Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.
  • From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:03:46 -0700


On Aug 13, 2009, at 12:38 PM, Brian Gardner wrote:

There is no issue until the user decides to alter a global value
by changing a parameter value.

That parameter change will in turn update the corresponding global value, stored in the singleton.

At this point, all of the other plugin instances set to useGlobalValues will have a parameter
value that still is set to the old global value, except the one that the user has just changed.
So, the change must be rippled to all of the other instances of the plugin.


Normally, I'd expect to do this by having the singleton maintain an array
to keep track of the relevant plugin instance id's. Toggling an instance's useGlobalValues
parameter, would add/remove it from the singleton's array.
The singleton could loop through this array, to send a message to each managed plugin instance
to perform a setParameter, to reflect whenever a global value changed.


But... just after an 'open project', the id's are not the same as in the previous session (I think),
and the singleton has an empty array anyway (singleton data wasn't seralized).
So, this array would need to be reconstructed somehow after the 'project open'.


Since the deserialization of the useGlobalValues parameter bypasses ParameterChanged,
it never invokes the singleton. So the singleton can't build a list of
the relevant plugin instance's new id's.


Perhaps, I can replace the toggle with a 'custom parameter' toggle,
just so that i can trap the deserialization? Then I could (re)build a new array upon project open.

Rather than having an array and trying to keep it in synch, what would probably be better is to use NSNotifications. When a plugin is set for global values, it tells the Notification Center that it wants to receive notifications from the singleton. When the singleton makes a change it tells the Notification Center to notify everyone who wanted to be notified of changes. That way, neither the plugins nor the singleton actually have to track each other.


Actually, the user wants these globals to be scoped to the sequence.
Almost like a Sequence Setting (but with easier access, since the globals are changed more often).


Unfortunately, I can't figure out how to do that.
So, the best I can do is using a singleton ... which is
probably Project scoped, which is acceptable.

Though, if the user can open multiple projects in one session,
then it's probably not even project scoped, it's probably session scoped.
(Session scoped is also not very desirable, either.)


Certainly, somehow, these global settings must be scoped and stored within the Project file.


Yes, if you create a singleton, it is application scoped, actually. It exists in the app's address space and would be used by all instances which request it.

We don't currently have a way for plugins to know about the sequence or project to which they are applied. It's been requested on a few occasions, but we haven't implemented it yet. Feel free to file a feature request. And let us know how you think it should work, too.

Darrin
--
Darrin Cardani
email@hidden


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Pro-apps-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >how trims & cuts effect reference image wells (From: Brian Gardner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: how trims & cuts effect reference image wells (From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>)
 >question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: "Jay Boyer" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Brian Gardner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Brian Gardner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Brian Gardner <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Darrin Cardani <email@hidden>)
 >Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances. (From: Brian Gardner <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.
  • Next by Date: [Q] Final Cut Pro and a video file of which size is still growing
  • Previous by thread: Re: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.
  • Next by thread: RE: question on refreshing parameter data between instances.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread