Open Menu
Close Menu
Apple
Shopping Bag
Apple
Mac
iPad
iPhone
Watch
TV
Music
Support
Search apple.com
Shopping Bag
Lists
Open Menu
Close Menu
Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists
image/points orientation in Motion 5 vs FCPX
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
image/points orientation in Motion 5 vs FCPX
Subject
:
image/points orientation in Motion 5 vs FCPX
From: Paul Miller <
email@hidden
>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:49:08 -0500
There seems to be a difference in image orientation between FCPX and Motion5. I noticed in Motion 5 that both point controls and images seemed to be interpreted up-side-down from the way I was doing things (in my stuff the top-left pixel is point 0,0). So I reversed the y axis for points and began walking images from bottom up and now my effect matches up in Motion 5.
However in FCPX something is now backward - it's either the points or the images, but I can't tell from the image row data pointers where the image origin is.
Anyone have any clue about each is supposed to work, and how you're supposed to tell which way the origin is?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Pro-apps-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Follow-Ups
:
Re: image/points orientation in Motion 5 vs FCPX
From:
Nathan Weston <email@hidden>
Prev by Date:
getInputBitmap in FCPX - giving me the drop source arrow icon instead of image?
Next by Date:
Re: getInputBitmap in FCPX - giving me the drop source arrow icon instead of image?
Previous by thread:
Re: getInputBitmap in FCPX - giving me the drop source arrow icon instead of image?
Next by thread:
Re: image/points orientation in Motion 5 vs FCPX
Index(es):
Date
Thread