Re: Are images cached? [NEWBIE]
Re: Are images cached? [NEWBIE]
- Subject: Re: Are images cached? [NEWBIE]
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 23:01:41 -0700
EOF caches enterprise objects for object graph consistency and efficiency.
WO caches WOComponents out of necessity - it is needed for the action
invoking mechanism. There are a few other caches you will be probably not
be aware of that are for efficiencies sake. But images... unless you have
a need to serve the images dynamically (such as security, they need to
change in ways that static images can't easily handle, etc.) a WO app is
not the right place to serve them from. It will cache them, but efficiency
is not the name of the game. Web servers are optimized for this. If at
all possible you should allow the web server to serve static content.
Leave WO for what it does best.
Chuck
At 12:24 AM 24/06/2003 -0400, Goodbye Bill wrote:
>Everyone I talk to is boasting that WebObjects will handle caching. Does
>this include images and, if so, does this mean that WebObjects will cache
>the images that are served using the WOImage object?
>_______________________________________________
>webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>
--
Chuck Hill email@hidden
Global Village Consulting Inc. http://www.global-village.net
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.