Re: little rant 1.4 and WO
Re: little rant 1.4 and WO
- Subject: Re: little rant 1.4 and WO
- From: Ricardo Strausz <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:56:34 -0600
Aloha Art and the rest co-listers
What do you think on the following:
Inside JavaVM.framework/Versions is a link named "CurrentJDK" which
points to the 1.4.1 folder.
May be, if this link is replaced by one (with the same name) which
points to the 1.3.1 folder, WO will be forced to use it.
Any experience yet with this isue?
On jueves, marz 13, 2003, at 14:33 America/Mexico_City, Art Isbell
wrote:
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 09:06 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
I can see how you folks are annoyed that 1.4.1 was _automatically_
installed on your computers with the auto upgrader, and that broke >> WO.
The fact that under OS X, the installation of 1.4.1 didn't replace
1.3.1 suggests to me that WO should be able to continue to use 1.3.1
until a WO version is qualified to work with 1.4.1. The 1.4.1 Release
Notes outline how to manage both 1.3.1 and 1.4.1 under OS X
(http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/macosx/ReleaseNotes/java141/
multiplevms/index.html). WO isn't discussed explicitly, but I'm
confident that we'll learn how to point WO processes at a particular
Java version.
Aloha,
Art
Dino
http://homepage.mac.com/strausz
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.