• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO blocking/threading question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO blocking/threading question


  • Subject: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • From: David Teran <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 10:52:36 +0200

Thanks for your explanation, Karl,

I'm still a little puzzled about WO servlet deployment. It seems that the jsp/servlet container is best suited to a multithreaded model for concurrent request handling, but among other reasons, since EOF is single threaded, running multiple instances is probably the best approach to scaling WO apps.

Am I missing something or is it fair to say you're best off sticking with multiple instances and the old school web server adaptor for scaling WO apps? It doesn't appear to be possible to have the servlet adaptor instantiate multiple instances of a web app within the same vm.

If this is the case when is it appropriate to use SSDD?

Dov? How do you deal with WO/EOF performance using the servlet adaptor?



AFAIK its true that for each servlet container you have 'only' running one instance from your app... but who tells you not to deploy one and the same app with different names ? Maybe this works fine.


But the real problem is still: EOF deadlocks when concurrent request handling is set to true. In order to fix this EOF should be able to detect a deadlock and throw somewhere. If anyone has EOF deadlocks, please send me the stack traces, i would love to see the traces, for studying.

regards David
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


References: 
 >WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: David Teran <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Parlee <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Hsu <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WO blocking/threading question (From: Michael Parlee <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Next by Date: Porting WO from 4.x to 5.2
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Next by thread: Re: WO blocking/threading question
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread