Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- Subject: Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- From: Michael Engelhart <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:05:26 -0500
Point taken but my concerns lie in the fact that the HTML 4 spec has
been out for many many years and WOBuilder still outputs HTML 3.2 which
makes me nervous. I'm less concerned with having a fully XHTML site
but I'd really like to see the option to show that Apple is keeping up
with the Jones's.
I can guarantee that if Macromedia Dreamweaver, BBEdit or Adobe GoLive
output HTML 3.2 formatted templates only nobody would use those tools.
It just rings of not being well developed by Apple. I realize there
are numerous factors involved in changing WO to be more "current" but
to start a project and try and convince peers it's worth risking on a
large project is hard to do especially when the tiny bit of marketing
hype Apple and the authors of the books out there always point to are
Fortune 500 websites like Disney, Adobe, and the BBC none of which
appear to use WO on their external web sites. I guess they could all
be using mod_rewrite but who knows.
Mike
On Feb 25, 2004, at 7:43 AM, Dev WO wrote:
If I can just give a point:
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.