Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- Subject: Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- From: "S. Turner" <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:25:56 -0500
Or a sleeper? It has always been up to the the developer and his sense
of business.
On Feb 25, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Daryl Thachuk wrote:
WebObjects is not dead, its just sleeping. ;-)
-d
------
Daryl Thachuk
Montage Technologies Inc.
http://www.montagetech.com
On Feb 25, 2004, at 5:18 AM, Michael Engelhart wrote:
I too have some concerns regarding WO's lagging behind as I'm
deciding at the moment on whether or not to use WO on my next large
project. One concern I also have on top of what Steven has
mentioned is that it appears that you can only output HTML 3.2
compliant HTML code. I'm not too happy with having to use such an
old DOCTYPE for my HTML code when most taggers use XHTML and CSS at
this point. Being new to WO, maybe there's (hoping?!) a way to
output XHTML without too much effort? I downloaded Project WONDER
yesterday but didn't find anything (although finding something with
only the API docs is a bit tough for a newbie - that project is
"massive").
Mike
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
team firstsightmedia
s. tunji turner
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.