Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- Subject: Re: Is WebObjects Dead?
- From: Brendan Lane Larson <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:12:27 -1000
Sleeping? Dead? How about Apple's in-house use of WO (e.g., the Apple
Store, the iTunes Music Store which is mission critical to their iPod
business).
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, at 05:09 AM, Daryl Thachuk wrote:
WebObjects is not dead, its just sleeping. ;-)
-d
------
Daryl Thachuk
Montage Technologies Inc.
http://www.montagetech.com
On Feb 25, 2004, at 5:18 AM, Michael Engelhart wrote:
I too have some concerns regarding WO's lagging behind as I'm
deciding at the moment on whether or not to use WO on my next large
project. One concern I also have on top of what Steven has
mentioned is that it appears that you can only output HTML 3.2
compliant HTML code. I'm not too happy with having to use such an
old DOCTYPE for my HTML code when most taggers use XHTML and CSS at
this point. Being new to WO, maybe there's (hoping?!) a way to
output XHTML without too much effort? I downloaded Project WONDER
yesterday but didn't find anything (although finding something with
only the API docs is a bit tough for a newbie - that project is
"massive").
Mike
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.