• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Any WWDC News (Business Logic)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any WWDC News (Business Logic)


  • Subject: Re: Any WWDC News (Business Logic)
  • From: Trae Nickelson <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 14:24:56 -0500

Hi Ray,

Good stuff. Thanks for the thoughts. I think you are more patient than I am.

Interesting point. Reminds me of so many of the strategy games we must
have all played. Warcraft / Starcraft, SimCity, Railroad Tycoon etc.

In each game the point is to make the right choices to utilise your
resources to the best effect. Spend too much on development and you get
overthrown. Get too aggressive and find yourself weak later in the
story.

Legitimate analogy. Following up with it, would not agree that WebObjects has already been overthrown? Four years ago it was the first, strongest warrior on the battlefield, in a position to dominate and lead the way for years to come. Now its probably still the strongest warrior on the field, but its curled up cowering in a little disfunctional ball under a tree, whispering to itself "I'm still the best, I'm still the strongest, I'm getting better all the time, etc.", while the battle wages on around it, and lesser competitors take the spoils of war. We are like the warriors' loyal little army, urging our warrior to "get up, fight"! But it just sits there, rocking back and forth, ignoring us, ignoring the battle, staring blankly into space.


How much longer should we carry this guy's flag? It's professional suicide!


You mention some successes Apple is having. Getting their toes in places that would not take a look a few years back. I wonder what the state of the game would be today if we were using WO with a hundred programmers constantly working to improve it. We would have a state of the art development and deployment tool.

It already is state-of-the-art. Has been for years. NOBODY knows it. Probably never will.



But would we have a company to buy these products from? Would Apple have made progress in other areas? Perhaps we would be running WO 6.5 on OS 10.1.55, installed on a colourful G3 iMac.

It wouldn't take that much. Let the current development team do their work. They do GREAT work. Just get 2 or 3 competent PR folks in there to make sure WebObjects is at least part of the general IT/Enterprise dialog, and free up a modest advertising budget. We (you, me, and the other readers of this list) could in large part take care of the rest!


Market success would actually enable a quicker pace of innovation.


I have said this on this forum before, but while I don't like feeling neglected any less than the next guy I have to assume that the people running this company have knowledge and experience I will never have. They didn't get where they are by taking short cuts (well, most of the time anyway).

I used to feel that way. I still do about the regions of Apple outside of WebObjects. But keep in mind, Apple has several notable debacles under its belt. I think this is one of them. I used to think, "these guys (the WO team at Apple) surely know more than the rest of us do. They are working on something. They understand what they have here. Be patient." But I am starting to smell the stink of blatant incompetence. There is NO ONE on this list who does not feel to some degree that Apple has squandered an opportunity for greatness with WebObjects. They might express it in different ways, to different degrees, at different volumes - but I would defy anyone to say that Apple has done this right.



When it comes down to it, I am using a product that I admire and appreciate. I would like more, but unfortunately in this game there are no cheats we can type in to give Apple all the resources it needs to conquer the PC world. And when it comes to Microsoft, honestly I would prefer to be beaten by them (market-share wise) than to be like them!

Perhaps there should be a little less grumbling and more understanding
that Apple can only do so much at one time. The last thing I want is to
abuse the people working so hard to give us this product, and drive
them away to somewhere where they are appreciated more.

My own grumbles are not directed at the developers of the tools - they are pulling their weight and then some. I think that the engineers working so hard to build our product, would be better served by a developer community that demands more support for them. Surely they get frustrated same as we do. Do you think they want to devote their lives and considerable talents to a losing cause? WebObjects is like the neglected step-daughter Cinderella. These people (WO engineers) deserve the proper marketing effort by Apple more than any of us.



Game over?


Game over? It pains me to say it, but I think the game was probably over long before I caught on. The battle has moved on to another hill. We're left standing here, carrying the WebObjects crest, next to our talented yet dysfunctional warrior, saying "What just happened here?".


Thanks,

Trae
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Any WWDC News
      • From: Rob Lockstone <email@hidden>
  • Prev by Date: Re: Future of WebObjects?
  • Next by Date: Re: Any WWDC News
  • Previous by thread: Re: Any WWDC News (Business Logic)
  • Next by thread: Re: Any WWDC News
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread