Re: À la recherche du temps perdu (was Re: F utur e of WebObjects?)
Re: À la recherche du temps perdu (was Re: F utur e of WebObjects?)
- Subject: Re: À la recherche du temps perdu (was Re: F utur e of WebObjects?)
- From: Ashley Aitken <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 00:50:35 +0800
Hi PA (and List Members),
On 02/07/2004, at 12:13 AM, petite_abeille wrote:
On Jul 01, 2004, at 16:28, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
If Apple doesn't provide it - someone else on the planet does!!
This is very true. Alternatives to WebObjects abound. No reason to get
all nostalgic about the good old days.
Could you please point me to an alternative for WO JavaClient
(client-side business objects, not proxies, with partitioning of data
and business logic, using the same container as the server side ...)?
Serious question.
Could you please point me to an alternative for D2* (Direct To Web,
Direct To Java Client and Direct To Web Services)? Again, serious
question. It's been said many times: these are to WO as WO was to
other Web development technologies.
My company is building an enterprise product current plans are to use
WO (because of the above) but we would very much like to lower our
risks (caused by Apple's secretive behaviour) by sourcing alternative
(but comparable) technologies.
We know about Tapestry, Cayenne, Hibernate, ... (which although great
technologies, I believe do none of the above).
Thanks,
Ashley.
--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia
mrhatken at mac dot com
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.