Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
- Subject: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
- From: Lotsa Cabo <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 15:08:10 -0400
Not so. ONLY seeing a running app is worthless; you are right.
HOWEVER, of the 200 or so people I have heard from, most of them want
to see running sample apps and then have an opportunity to see the
source and have a walkthrough as to what is happening.
R/S
Ryan
_________________________
Tired of spam? Signup for a FREE SpamJammer.Com account and say
goodbye to junk email forever!
On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:33 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
> The key to get the rest of the world to appreciate what is going on
> behind
> the scenes would be an in depth analysis of the source code to explain
> to a
> lay user what WO/EOF is doing for them. Seeing a running app probably
> wouldn't give them the appreciation for the savings in terms of
> implementation costs, support costs, overall lifescycle costs.
>
> I think that analysis would be a great introduction to compare EJB to
> WO/EOF.
>
>
>
> On 7/5/04 2:22 PM, "Lotsa Cabo" <email@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Dov,
>>
>> If I may, I would assume that Hunter meant to implement it ONLINE for
>> the rest of the world to see. It's great that WE all have it on our
>> boxes, but remember that the goal of the "Why WebObjects" site should
>> be to show others [whom do not yet have WebObjects] what they are
>> missing.
>>
>> R/S
>> Ryan
>> _________________________
>> Tired of spam? Signup for a FREE SpamJammer.Com account and say
>> goodbye to junk email forever!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:06 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>>> It has already been done - look in your
>>> Developer/Examples/JavaWebObjects
>>> directory.
>>>
>>> Dov Rosenberg
>>> Conviveon Corporation
>>>
>>> On 7/5/04 1:47 PM, "Hunter Hillegas" <email@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> How about implementing Sun's PetStore or some similar reference app
>>>> in
>>>> WO to show the superiority of the frameworks?
>>>>
>>>> Hunter
>>>>
>>>> On Jul 3, 2004, at 9:05 PM, Alexandra Milton wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Another key issue for a site is as I said before - comparisons.
>>>>> That
>>>>> way the chance of people interesting in other technologies will
>>>>> come
>>>>> to us is bigger if they are looking for information about J2EE,
>>>>> .Net
>>>>> and stumble over WO...
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dov Rosenberg
>>> Conviveon Corporation
>>> 370 Centerpointe Circle, suite 1178
>>> Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
>>> http://www.conviveon.com
>>> email@hidden
>>> AOL IM: dovrosenberg
>>> (407) 339-1177 x102
>>> (407) 339-6704 (fax)
>>> (800) 475-9890
>>> (407) 310-8316 (cell)
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Archives:
>>> http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Dov Rosenberg
> Conviveon Corporation
> 370 Centerpointe Circle, suite 1178
> Altamonte Springs, FL 32701
> http://www.conviveon.com
> email@hidden
> AOL IM: dovrosenberg
> (407) 339-1177 x102
> (407) 339-6704 (fax)
> (800) 475-9890
> (407) 310-8316 (cell)
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.