Re: SSDD + Tomcat
Re: SSDD + Tomcat
- Subject: Re: SSDD + Tomcat
- From: Ricardo Cortes <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:22:07 -0700 (PDT)
Hello and thanks Karl :)
I got it all working last night. I downloaded the latest version of Tomcat and
deployed the WO app using SSDD and it worked like a charm. All the frameworks
and necessary Jar files were automagically copied for me. I didn't have to
change a thing. I imagine the error I was getting was due to my application
provider's specific shared Tomcat setup. I'll have to hound him about that.
Ciao,
Ricardo
--- Hsu <email@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jul 2, 2004, at 5:09 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
>
> > You still need to deploy your own frameworks and the relevant WO JAR
> > files that
> > your app uses though. I am going to investigate further.
>
> Again, you do not need to copy your own frameworks; the entire point of
> the SSDD deployment is that it is self-contained; no additional work
> should be necessary.
>
> If you want the WO JAR files to be copied, set the Build variable
> SERVLET_COPY_JARS to YES
>
> Karl
>
>
> > On 7/2/04 7:50 AM, "Dov Rosenberg" <email@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> You do need to include the base WOFrameworks for a SSDD when you
> >> deploy to a
> >> clean machine or else nothing works. At a minimum you probably need
> >>
> >> JavaEOAccess.framework
> >> JavaEOControl.framework
> >> JavaEOProject.framework
> >> JavaFoundation.framework
> >> JavaJDBCAdaptor.framework
> >> JavaWebObjects.framework
> >> JavaWOExtensions.framework
> >> JavaWOJSPServlet.framework
> >>
> >> You also need to get the jar files from the frameworks copied into the
> >> WEB-INF/lib directory if you want to be able to use any of the WO
> >> APIs like
> >> NSArray in your JSP pages.
> >>
> >> If you are using WOComponents on your JSP pages you need the WO
> >> taglibrary
> >> registered in your WEB-INF/web.xml file as well.
> >>
> >> The license key gets deployed to the
> >> JavaWebObjects.framework/Resources/License.key file
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/2/04 1:02 AM, "Hsu" <email@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Actually, the entire point of an SSDD deployment is that it is
> >>> completely standalone - you do not need WO installed on the machine.
> >>> However, it is imperative that you have a correct deployment license
> >>> in
> >>> JavaWebObjects.framework. Note that the prompt from Xcode ("please
> >>> enter a valid deployment license") doesn't actually check the
> >>> validity
> >>> of the license, so you may not have typed it in correctly - Xcode
> >>> allows any non-empty string.
> >>>
> >>> Karl
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 1, 2004, at 7:51 AM, Dov Rosenberg wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Usually the problem is the web.xml file is doesn't have the correct
> >>>> path
> >>>> information in it. If you are deploying to a clean server, you need
> >>>> to
> >>>> include all of the WO frameworks in your WAR/deployment files. The
> >>>> regular
> >>>> SSDD deployment doesn't seem to include the WO Frameworks. Make sure
> >>>> you
> >>>> have a deployment key incorporated in the JavaWebObjects.framework
> >>>> otherwise
> >>>> your app will not run.
> >>>>
> >>>> HTH
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/1/04 10:30 AM, "Ricardo Cortes" <email@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi there,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I saw some posts awhile back about folks having problems with
> >>>>> various
> >>>>> versions
> >>>>> of Tomcat and their Servlet Single Directory Deployments. Can
> >>>>> anyone
> >>>>> tell me
> >>>>> if there is a specific version of Tomcat that is validated against
> >>>>> SSDD? I
> >>>>> have been able to successfully deploy on my Tomcat instance at home
> >>>>> (4.x) but
> >>>>> my application provider is running Tomcat 4.1.29. When he starts
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> application, I get the following error. Anyone have a clue?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Ricardo
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> HTTP Status 503 - Servlet WOServletAdaptor is currently unavailable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> type Status report
> >>>>>
> >>>>> message Servlet WOServletAdaptor is currently unavailable
> >>>>>
> >>>>> description The requested service (Servlet WOServletAdaptor is
> >>>>> currently unavailable) is not currently available.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> --
>
> With a curvaceous figure that Venus would have envied, a tanned,
> unblemished oval face framed with lustrous thick brown hair, deep
> azure-blue eyes fringed with long black lashes, perfect teeth that vied
> for competition, and a small straight nose, Marilee had a beauty that
> defied descripition.
>
> Homepage:
> http://homepage.mac.com/khsu/index.html
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.