• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)


  • Subject: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
  • From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 20:19:40 -0500

Well it is nice to get back from my little vacation. I was actually looking forward
to some positive news from the developers conference. I was especially looking
forward to a WO 6.0 type announcement. Obviously, there was no WO 6.0 and
we all felt a bit slighted to say the least. I mean, can't Apple with 4 Billion in the
bank afford a small team of 5 individuals to work with Wonder, WOLips, etc., to
make the product sing? It is hard for me to imagine the downside risk here. A
million dollars a year is pocket change for Apple and the upside could be a real
enterprise door opener. Ok, say 1 million is too much for Apple to spend a year
on this fantastic product.... open source it then! This in-between strategy is the
absolute worst strategy. It leads to stagnation, alienation, and no enterprise
advantage to market. If Steve or someone at Apple could educate me as to this
strategy's cost/benefit I would love to hear it.


Anyway, the real problem with WebObjects is marketing. I think this is what we
agree on. Well, we could look upon this as an opportunity. If we all took the
time to give some of our talent and resources, maybe we could create a nice
WebObjects "associatoin". The charter would be to promote WebObjects. Hey,
maybe even Apple could seed us a grant or two to help jump start our campaigns.


The beautiful thing here is that our promotional efforts would also generate clients.

Strictly off the top of my head I envision an association which is responsible for
"open sourcing" frameworks, generating courseware and presentations, mass
mailings to our core constituents with a monthly newsletter, consolidated website and
monitoring of all geek sites and magazines. Strong communication with Apple would
then become easier too. We could even maybe run ads. I did say that Apple could
give us a grant or two. I would have to figure that if we did this for
one solid year we would make an impact.


I could go on, but then that would have to lead to a full blown marketing plan. Well
that is my two cents on the matter after my nice vacation.


Good to be back,
James Cicenia
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
      • From: Andrus Adamchik <email@hidden>
    • Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
      • From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: Bob McCormick <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: Alexandra Milton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick) (From: Thomas <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Get past Axis logging problem
  • Next by Date: Re: Renaming a Project
  • Previous by thread: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
  • Next by thread: Re: A "Why WebObjects" Site / Initial Thoughts Please (Modified by Bob McCormick)
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread