Re: Explain "take"
Re: Explain "take"
- Subject: Re: Explain "take"
- From: "b.bum" <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:58:45 -0700
On Jul 11, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Arturo Pirez wrote:
> Interesting question. Here's my "take" which may have no bearing on
> reality.
>
> 1) It's a historical accident. Most of WO predates the o-o revolution.
Most of the "OO" revolution has been a non-event from the perspective
of WebObjects. Most of what Java and, now, .NET is calling
"revolutionary advances" in OO technology is already a "been there,
done that, know a better way" event in the history of WebObjects, EOF,
DBKit, Mac OS X, OpenStep, NeXTSTEP, and Objective-C.
These days, the .NET and Java crowd is trying to tell us that OO
architectures are incapable of dealing with complex object graphs,
instead encouraging everyone to wrap everything up with WebServices and
XSLT/XML related technologies.
I would imagine that there are quite a number of WebObjects developers
laughing at that particular claim.
b.bum
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.