Re: Alternatives to WO
Re: Alternatives to WO
- Subject: Re: Alternatives to WO
- From: Ray Ackland <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 13:14:50 +1200
Kind of like saying "Do you like my beachside house? I spent millions
of dollars on it and years of effort to get it just so. But at the
moment I'm busy working on the other coast so I'd be willing to give it
to the council to do what they like with it".
Even if Apple aren't developing WO further, not only would they be
sacrificing any income stream they are currently enjoying, but forgo
any opportunity to capitalise on their property in the future should
the opportunity come to continue developing it.
I don't see it happening either, and can understand why they wouldn't.
r
On 01/07/2004, at 13:29, shaun wrote:
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 09:48:55 +1000, "Jake MacMullin"
<email@hidden> said:
[snip]
Simple solution: Release WebObjects as Open Source.
YEH! right on! That would be awesome! But I doubt it will ever happen.
You'd have a huge increase in the size of the development team, Apple
would
benefit from improvements in WebObjects for their internal
applications,
and
the WebObjects community could take control of their own destiny -
rather
than relying on Apple to realise what a great technology they're
sitting
on.
it sounds wonderfull!
regards
-
shaun
_______________________________________________
webobjects-dev mailing list | email@hidden
Help/Unsubscribe/Archives: http://www.lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-dev
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.