Re: WO & Lucene
Re: WO & Lucene
- Subject: Re: WO & Lucene
- From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:53:47 -0400
Interesting idea, the native Lucene API probably wouldn't be too hard to
wrap some EO stuff around. The biggest concern I would have is the overhead
associated with EOF - especially when Lucene can handle millions of records.
My experience with bulk operations in EOF hasn't been too positive.
Lucene is pretty efficient as is. Perhaps a more WOCentric API wrapper would
be better - i.e. NSArrays, etc.
--
Dov Rosenberg
Conviveon Corporation
http://www.conviveon.com
On 10/27/04 7:16 AM, "Petite Abeille" <email@hidden> wrote:
>> I'd love to hear a little about how each of you have approached your
>> Lucene-WO integration.
>
> Talking of which... considering that everybody and their mother-in-law
> seem to finally have succumbed to the discreet charm of Lucene [1]...
> did anyone bother writing a nice EO and/or JDBC adaptor to
> transparently integrate both worlds?
>
> In a nutshell, such an adaptor could either automatically bridge the
> EO/Document realms (by converting EOs into Documents, EOQualifiers
> into Queries, etc) and/or be used as a substitute database in its own
> right.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> PA.
>
> [1] http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0068361/
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> n.com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden