• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship


  • Subject: Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship
  • From: Arturo Perez <email@hidden>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:07:48 -0400

Des Oates wrote:

Hi Arturo,

Thanks for the follow up. I started from scratch again and followed your steps, and apparently I get a different outcome than you do. I put some comments inline on that, but its not so relevant now, since in the process of doing this, I got to the bottom of my problem.


If you have the time could you try cntl-dragging in the other direction? That instead of



We cntrl-drag from fkData to pkData and we have our one-to-one relationship, bidirectional by default.

This is where I start to deviate. I don't get a 1-1 relationship by default. I get a 1-many by default, where 1 'TheData' maps to many 'TheState's


Could you cntrl-drag from pkData to fkData. I think the error you got may be EOModeller complaining that fkData is not the primary key of State (which it isn't).
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Des Oates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Drew Thoeni <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Des Oates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Drew Thoeni <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Des Oates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Arturo Pérez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Drew Thoeni <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Arturo Pérez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Drew Thoeni <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Des Oates <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Arturo Perez <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship (From: Des Oates <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Don't upgrade to 10.3.9!
  • Next by Date: Re: [ANN] ExistsInRelationshipQualifier: WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM A WHERE ...)
  • Previous by thread: Re: Bi-directional One-to-one relationship
  • Next by thread: 10.3.9 Update-Java crash
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread