Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
- Subject: Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
- From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:03:21 -0500
All you really need to do is sell them on the reasons EJB is not worth the
effort and then show them how slick EOF is. The benefits of developing WO
based solution are much the same as any Java based project. You have full
access to the Java world including all of the J2EE stuff (good and bad) but
without the overhead and maintenance issues associated with EJB.
Look at WO/EOF as very useful frameworks and third party JARs that you use
in your Java Applications.
--
Dov Rosenberg
Conviveon Corporation
On 1/16/05 3:13 AM, "Ken Tozier" <email@hidden> wrote:
> I'm just dipping my toes into WebObjects (looks really cool so far) but
> I'm VERY nervous about Apple's commitment to it. I got really burned
> when they dropped OpenDoc in the 90's, lost almost a year's work and I
> don't want to go down that road again.
>
> How busy are you WebObject pros?
>
> Do you get the sense that it's something Apple plans to stick with for
> the next five years or so?
>
> Have WebObjects projects been a hard sell to clients?
>
> Thanks for any info
>
> Ken
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> n.com
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden