Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
- Subject: Re: Health of WebObjects - developer/user base?
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:25:35 +0100
"email@hidden" <email@hidden> wrote:
> When we do start selling it to clients my intention is to present it as
> Java first, and the WO part as a handy collection of libraries that do
> much of the heavy lifting for you. Just like writing in Java but
> faster, so it saves the client money. That's a gross
> oversimplification, but it's close enough and it shouldn't be too hard
> to make an effective sales pitch from it.
We have learned not to say "Apple". We talk about Java, databases, and a
collection of libraries to build web/online applications the fast way with
templates, components, and a lot of abstractiion layers.
If you say "Apple", bigger companies in Germany will tell you to "go away
with this graphics designer crap".
cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden