Re: 5.3 Licensing terms, as noted on apple's site
Re: 5.3 Licensing terms, as noted on apple's site
- Subject: Re: 5.3 Licensing terms, as noted on apple's site
- From: Joe Little <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:40:52 -0700
Oh.. I agree. But its a truth in advertising thing. If Apple sells it
that way...
They have yet to come clean on what the licensing means, and I hope
they do some day. I'm just not that hopeful that they will until the
next XCode or OSX Server ships, where 5.3 would have come w/ the boxed
copy instead of being an added update.
On 10/20/05, David Teran <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> > I justed noticed that in the tech specs for WO 5.3, they give pretty
> > implicit permission to use the product on any java app server as long
> > as you have a license. This is likely the best we can hope for.
> >
> > Check out http://www.apple.com/webobjects/specs.html in the lower
> > right hand corner
>
> Yes, thats fine, but unless its written in the license file as easy
> as its written here i do not trust apple 100%. But besides this my
> real concern is what say customers if they ask about the wo license
> for your last project which you installed in their intranet on a ugh,
> linux box. Will they accept: hey, its not in the license agreement,
> but check this out: http://www.apple.com/webobjects/specs.html (lower
> right hand corner) ;-)
>
> cheers, David
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden