• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4


  • Subject: Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4
  • From: Niels Meersschaert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 16:38:17 -0400

I agree it doesn't mean the end of WO. PHP has shipped with OS X for years now & that didn't kill WO either. However, since WebObjects Builder was just refreshed last WWDC and XCode began supporting EOModeler a bit, I doubt we'll be left without a tool to use. All of those tools could very easily become full Cocoa-tools. Since WO 5.3 when development on other platforms officially disappeared, the need for the Cocoa-Java bridge for those tools become much less important, since they could become platform-dependent. Not being at WWDC, I don't know what announcements are occurring there on WO, but with the release notes saying these are deprecated, I would expect replacement tools to be announced this week.


On Aug 8, 2006, at 8:54 PM, John Larson wrote:

I'm sorry, Ken. Your rational perspective is no match for the Fear of Ruby.

Tto append your comments, Ken, and to further argue my way into a stable state of mind again, this is a technology that has been around since the NeXT days. (this is where I get to "gloat" about going to a college with "the largest NeXT network in the world." I even pried a logo off a machine for posterity.) It is a terribly functional, serious development platform that Apple probably devotes 10 man hours a year to maintaining. Once you read the manual, you appreciate how much it can do, and how much more functional it is than any other web app development tool out there. That also means it is complicated and appeals to a limited audience. Personally, even with the talk of Ruby, I think that WebObjects' time still has not come. I don't think that until the Script Wars get fought out will we see what will provide the level of integration that WebObjects does. Anyone who's written Perl, Ruby or JScript and WebObjects knows that there is nothing like it. Scripted languages simply don't give you the same control over the whole model with the same performance.

Though I believe it is possible that we could get stuck with the same crappy WebBuilder interface, I hope they just don't throw WO out. If they do, maybe it is time to breath life into Wotonomy - with Wonder integrated . . . WonderTonomy. Sounds like a cirque de soleil act.

John

On Aug 8, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:

Please everyone - half the problem is everyone asking if it's dead - it's almost worse.

Here's the deal from my humble perspective:

1) Apple made a long term commitment to WebObjects when they made it part of the toolset last year.
2) Apple uses WebObjects significantly themselves


Sure, Apple could have kept using WO internally and not made it part of the tools, but they DID make it part of the tools. It would be pretty ridiculous to take it OUT of the tools, but keep using it internally, right?

Please, stop talking about it being on it's last legs...it's far from it. It doesn't get the same presence because, quite honestly, it's not a very 'Appleish' technology. Apple wants to sell computers, and glitzy cocoa stuff sells computers - it's their model, and it works for them.

James - sorry to respond to your email - this is just a general sentiment I wanted to respond to.

Ken

On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:38 PM, James Cicenia wrote:

Can anybody give us at least a thumbs up, down or sideways with regards to our beloved WebObjects?

Someone has to know!

- James Cicenia


On Aug 8, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Mike Nowak wrote:

I did notice this in the publicly release Xcode 2.4 release:

NOTE: As of the release of Xcode 2.4, the Cocoa Java bridge has been deprecated. This means that,
while still supported with Xcode 2.4, future releases of Xcode may not support the bridge or other
dependent features. Due to this, the following additional WebObjects developer applications are also
being deprecated:


EOModeler
EOModeler Plugin
WebObjects Builder
WebServices Assistant
RuleEditor
WOALauncher

I hope this means the built-in editor in Xcode is all good now...

On Aug 7, 2006, at 3:29 PM, swdmail 2006 wrote:

Is there any updates/upgrades to WeboObjects in Xcode 3.0 ?


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >Any WebObjects updates in Xcode 3.0 ? (From: "swdmail 2006" <email@hidden>)
 >A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4 (From: Mike Nowak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4 (From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4 (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)
 >Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4 (From: John Larson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: The shirts are having an impact!
  • Next by Date: Is Xcode 2.4 safe to install?
  • Previous by thread: Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4
  • Next by thread: Re: A change I noticed in Xcode 2.4
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread